Author: Professor Dr. Syed Arif
Kamal Previous Article Next Article Printable Version
PDF
The scientific method is closely related to the natural and
the observable world. Questions and hypotheses come from observations
and are tested by fresh observations. Observations are available to us
in nature, e. g., volcano eruption, generation of heat in the Sun. In
general, we do not have much control on these observations. However, planned
observations of the heavenly bodies (e. g., motions of planets) are the
essence of the observational astronomy. On the other hand, experiments
are planned and controlled. These are, mostly, performed in laboratories. The
purpose of an experiment is to better understand the natural world and
not to merely understand the experimental data. If one
constructs a triangle with a model, an experiment and a simulation
(a computerized experiment) lying on its vertices nature lies at the
center with all the four interconnected (Fig. 1). Recall that all theories and laws are
valid within certain limits. An experiment can only produce an estimate
of the true state of nature.
Fig. 1. Model, simulation and experiment
Following
are the steps needed to solve a problem using scientific method (Fig. 2):
a) |
Observing a natural phenomenon. |
b) |
Developing a question about cause and
effect. |
c) |
Formulating a tentative answer to the
question (hypothesis) through inductive generalization from the observations. |
d) |
Working out the consequences
(predictions) of the formulated hypothesis. |
e) |
Testing the hypothesis by taking further
observations/conducting an experiment. |
Take
the famous example of the Newton's apple.
Observation: |
Apple falls towards the earth. |
Question: |
Why does the apple not go in other
direction? |
Tentative Answer: |
The earth attracts everything towards
itself? |
Consequence: |
A ball, which is left without support,
shall fall towards the earth. |
Experimentation: |
Ball eventually falls towards the
earth. |
Fig. 2. Steps in
problem solving
The observations on which a scientific theory is based must
be reproducible by anyone with the proper training and the facilities.
If one takes observations at different places and at different times, one must
obtain the same results. Such observations are called stable. Two
observers conducting the same experiment under identical conditions must get
identical results. Such observations are termed as objective. Not all
the observations are identical at different places. If an observer measures
atmospheric pressure at Karachi and the other measures at Nathiagali the values
shall be different. Similarly, all observations are not identical at different
times. One observes stars during the night and sun during the day. Are the laws
based on these observations valid at different places and at different times?
Science is based on the notion that the physical laws are globally valid.
In fact it does not make any sense to do science, spend a lot of money and
time, only, to find laws, which are not valid at different places and, during
different periods of times. If one is not careful one may try to formulate a
general law, which does not satisfy these conditions. For example, it never
snows in Karachi or in Lahore. If one makes a law that it never snows in
Pakistan, it would be incorrect because it does snow in Murree (law not valid
at different places). Else, from the general observation that it is never dark
during the day, a law formulated that it is never dark during the day time
is wrong because it is dark during a total solar eclipse (law not valid at
different times).
The great scientific experiments served to elaborate the
formal aspects of method (decide between rival hypotheses, find the form of a law
inductively, explore the characteristics of a naturally occurring process, use
models to simulate processes, exploit an accident, interpret null results),
develop the content of a theory (find hidden mechanism of a known effect,
provide existence evidence, decompose a simple phenomenon), establish
techniques (accuracy and care in manipulation, power and versatility of
apparatus).
There
are good experiments and there are bad experiments. Many are
either poor experiments, which can result in wrong decisions, or inefficient
experiments, which result in excessive cost or time delay in reaching a
decision. The main reasons are lack of training in the strategy of
experimenting, incorrect decisions based on insufficient data, bad engineering
decisions by setting vague objectives for projects, inappropriate statistics
courses taught in the colleges and in the universities.
A scientific approach to every problem whether it
is in science, engineering, economics or finance is sure to bring results. To
do so one must develop a keen observation of nature asking the questions how
and why. A scientist must always follow the truth.
Nobody is scared in science. Nothing is accepted by faith.
All statements must be tested by observations and experiments.
Appeared in AGAHI,
magazine of the Shaheed-é-Millat Government Degree College for Women, Azizabad,
Karachi, 2007, pp 1-3 (Intellectual Preview)
Updated:
February 1, 2023 (0000h UTC) Previous Article Next Article Printable Version
PDF
½ Debates ½ Proposal Writing
½ Problem Solving PDF ½ Early Talent
Research Participation Program ½ Life History
½ |
Best viewed with 800 x 600 screen resolution using Microsoft Internet Explorer. Copyright 1998-2023. Professor Dr. Syed Arif Kamal